Daily Study Sheet

Current Affairs

2026-07-09
Change Date2026-07-09
July 2026
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
Saved notes Practice today's questions
Lead Issueप्रमुख विषय
International Relations · Lead 1
PM Modi’s Australia Visit Deepens Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Australia from 8-10 July 2026 for the 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit in Melbourne with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The visit produced major outcomes in …

Exam Points

  • PM Narendra Modi visited Australia from 8-10 July 2026.
  • The visit was for the 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit in Melbourne.
  • The summit was hosted by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
  • India and Australia completed six years of Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.
  • Both sides agreed to work towards early finalisation of CECA.
  • Key outcomes included Joint Declaration on Defence and Security Cooperation and Maritime Security Collaboration Roadmap.
  • India and Australia finalised administrative arrangements under civil nuclear cooperation, enabling supply of Australian uranium to India for peaceful purposes under IAEA safeguards.
  • PACTS was announced for cyber, critical technologies and supply chains.
  • A MoU was concluded between the Indian Coast Guard and Australia’s Maritime Border Command.
  • Australia invited an Indian military instructor to the Australian Defence College for 2028-29.
  • A Centre of Excellence in Mining Equipment, Technology and Services will be set up at NSTI Bhubaneswar with TAFE Western Australia.
  • Flinders University received a Letter of Intent to set up a campus in Bengaluru.
  • Victoria University received approval to set up and operate a campus in Gurugram.
  • Three Indian artefacts of Tamil Nadu origin will be repatriated: Nandi, Bhadrakali Trident, and six-headed Skanda/Karttikeya.
  • A Rooftop Solar Training Academy was operationalised at Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, aiming to train 2,000 women and youth.
  • CSIR-TKDL access agreement was signed with IP Australia.
  • PM Modi addressed the Indian diaspora at Marvel Stadium, Melbourne.
  • PM Modi and PM Albanese visited the Melbourne Cricket Ground and jointly released the India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration.
GS2: India-Australia Relations, Indo-Pacific, Quad, Diaspora, Cultural Diplomacy; GS3: Defence, Cyber Security, Critical Minerals, Civil Nuclear Energy, Supply Chains, Education and Technology

News Item

Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Australia from 8-10 July 2026 for the 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit in Melbourne with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The visit produced major outcomes in defence, maritime security, civil nuclear energy, critical minerals, cyber and critical technologies, education, sports, traditional knowledge and cultural heritage.

Background

India and Australia completed six years of their Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and agreed to deepen cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. Both sides reaffirmed commitment to an ambitious and mutually beneficial Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), while building on the existing Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA). The leaders also recognised the role of the Indian diaspora, education links and sports as strong people-to-people bridges.

Prelims Facts

  • PM Narendra Modi visited Australia from 8-10 July 2026.
  • The visit was for the 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit in Melbourne.
  • The summit was hosted by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
  • India and Australia completed six years of Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.
  • Both sides agreed to work towards early finalisation of CECA.
  • Key outcomes included Joint Declaration on Defence and Security Cooperation and Maritime Security Collaboration Roadmap.
  • India and Australia finalised administrative arrangements under civil nuclear cooperation, enabling supply of Australian uranium to India for peaceful purposes under IAEA safeguards.
  • PACTS was announced for cyber, critical technologies and supply chains.
  • A MoU was concluded between the Indian Coast Guard and Australia’s Maritime Border Command.
  • Australia invited an Indian military instructor to the Australian Defence College for 2028-29.
  • A Centre of Excellence in Mining Equipment, Technology and Services will be set up at NSTI Bhubaneswar with TAFE Western Australia.
  • Flinders University received a Letter of Intent to set up a campus in Bengaluru.
  • Victoria University received approval to set up and operate a campus in Gurugram.
  • Three Indian artefacts of Tamil Nadu origin will be repatriated: Nandi, Bhadrakali Trident, and six-headed Skanda/Karttikeya.
  • A Rooftop Solar Training Academy was operationalised at Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, aiming to train 2,000 women and youth.
  • CSIR-TKDL access agreement was signed with IP Australia.
  • PM Modi addressed the Indian diaspora at Marvel Stadium, Melbourne.
  • PM Modi and PM Albanese visited the Melbourne Cricket Ground and jointly released the India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration.
Mains Focus & Analysis
  • PM Modi’s Australia visit shows that India-Australia ties are now moving beyond diaspora and cricket into a full-spectrum strategic partnership. Defence and maritime outcomes strengthen Indo-Pacific security; PACTS and critical minerals cooperation address technology and supply-chain vulnerabilities; uranium and energy cooperation support India’s energy security; education and skilling outcomes build human capital; and TKDL plus artefact repatriation add cultural and knowledge-diplomacy dimensions. For India’s foreign policy, Australia is now a key partner in balancing economic growth, technology resilience and rules-based regional order.

GS Mapping

GS2: India-Australia Relations, Indo-Pacific, Quad, Diaspora, Cultural Diplomacy; GS3: Defence, Cyber Security, Critical Minerals, Civil Nuclear Energy, Supply Chains, Education and Technology

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about PM Modi’s 2026 Australia visit: 1. India and Australia finalised administrative arrangements enabling supply of Australian uranium to India for peaceful purposes under IAEA safeguards. 2. PACTS focuses on cyber, critical technologies and supply chains. 3. The India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration was released during the visit. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: D
Explanation: All three statements are correct. The visit produced outcomes on civil nuclear cooperation, PACTS, and the India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration.
प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की ऑस्ट्रेलिया यात्रा से Comprehensive Strategic Partnership को नई मजबूती
प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने 8-10 जुलाई 2026 तक Melbourne में ऑस्ट्रेलियाई प्रधानमंत्री Anthony Albanese के साथ 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit में भाग लेने के लिए Australia की यात्रा की। इस …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने 8-10 जुलाई 2026 तक Australia की यात्रा की।
  • यह यात्रा Melbourne में 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit के लिए थी।
  • Summit की मेजबानी Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ने की।
  • भारत और ऑस्ट्रेलिया ने Comprehensive Strategic Partnership के छह वर्ष पूरे किए।
  • दोनों पक्षों ने CECA को जल्द finalise करने की प्रतिबद्धता दोहराई।
  • प्रमुख outcomes में Joint Declaration on Defence and Security Cooperation और Maritime Security Collaboration Roadmap शामिल रहे।
  • Civil nuclear cooperation के तहत administrative arrangements finalise हुए, जिससे Australian uranium की India को peaceful purposes के लिए IAEA safeguards के अंतर्गत supply संभव होगी।
  • Cyber, critical technologies और supply chains के लिए PACTS घोषित किया गया।
  • Indian Coast Guard और Australia के Maritime Border Command के बीच MoU हुआ।
  • Australia ने 2028-29 के लिए Australian Defence College में Indian military instructor को invite किया।
  • NSTI Bhubaneswar में TAFE Western Australia के साथ Mining Equipment, Technology and Services में Centre of Excellence स्थापित होगा।
  • Flinders University को Bengaluru में campus स्थापित करने के लिए Letter of Intent मिला।
  • Victoria University को Gurugram में campus स्थापित और operate करने की approval मिली।
  • Tamil Nadu origin की तीन Indian artefacts repatriate होंगी: Nandi, Bhadrakali Trident, और six-headed Skanda/Karttikeya।
  • Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar में Rooftop Solar Training Academy operationalise हुई, जिसका लक्ष्य 2,000 women and youth को train करना है।
  • CSIR-TKDL access agreement IP Australia के साथ signed हुआ।
  • प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने Marvel Stadium, Melbourne में Indian diaspora को संबोधित किया।
  • प्रधानमंत्री मोदी और प्रधानमंत्री Albanese ने Melbourne Cricket Ground का दौरा किया और India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration jointly release किया।
GS2: India-Australia relations, Indo-Pacific, Quad, diaspora, cultural diplomacy; GS3: defence, cyber security, critical minerals, civil nuclear energy, supply chains, education और technology

समाचार

प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने 8-10 जुलाई 2026 तक Melbourne में ऑस्ट्रेलियाई प्रधानमंत्री Anthony Albanese के साथ 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit में भाग लेने के लिए Australia की यात्रा की। इस यात्रा में defence, maritime security, civil nuclear energy, critical minerals, cyber and critical technologies, education, sports, traditional knowledge और cultural heritage जैसे क्षेत्रों में महत्वपूर्ण outcomes सामने आए।

पृष्ठभूमि

भारत और ऑस्ट्रेलिया ने अपनी Comprehensive Strategic Partnership के छह वर्ष पूरे किए और Indo-Pacific में सहयोग गहरा करने पर सहमति जताई। दोनों पक्षों ने existing Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) को आगे बढ़ाते हुए ambitious और mutually beneficial Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) को जल्द finalise करने की प्रतिबद्धता दोहराई। नेताओं ने Indian diaspora, education links और sports को भी मजबूत people-to-people bridges माना।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने 8-10 जुलाई 2026 तक Australia की यात्रा की।
  • यह यात्रा Melbourne में 3rd India-Australia Annual Summit के लिए थी।
  • Summit की मेजबानी Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ने की।
  • भारत और ऑस्ट्रेलिया ने Comprehensive Strategic Partnership के छह वर्ष पूरे किए।
  • दोनों पक्षों ने CECA को जल्द finalise करने की प्रतिबद्धता दोहराई।
  • प्रमुख outcomes में Joint Declaration on Defence and Security Cooperation और Maritime Security Collaboration Roadmap शामिल रहे।
  • Civil nuclear cooperation के तहत administrative arrangements finalise हुए, जिससे Australian uranium की India को peaceful purposes के लिए IAEA safeguards के अंतर्गत supply संभव होगी।
  • Cyber, critical technologies और supply chains के लिए PACTS घोषित किया गया।
  • Indian Coast Guard और Australia के Maritime Border Command के बीच MoU हुआ।
  • Australia ने 2028-29 के लिए Australian Defence College में Indian military instructor को invite किया।
  • NSTI Bhubaneswar में TAFE Western Australia के साथ Mining Equipment, Technology and Services में Centre of Excellence स्थापित होगा।
  • Flinders University को Bengaluru में campus स्थापित करने के लिए Letter of Intent मिला।
  • Victoria University को Gurugram में campus स्थापित और operate करने की approval मिली।
  • Tamil Nadu origin की तीन Indian artefacts repatriate होंगी: Nandi, Bhadrakali Trident, और six-headed Skanda/Karttikeya।
  • Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar में Rooftop Solar Training Academy operationalise हुई, जिसका लक्ष्य 2,000 women and youth को train करना है।
  • CSIR-TKDL access agreement IP Australia के साथ signed हुआ।
  • प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने Marvel Stadium, Melbourne में Indian diaspora को संबोधित किया।
  • प्रधानमंत्री मोदी और प्रधानमंत्री Albanese ने Melbourne Cricket Ground का दौरा किया और India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration jointly release किया।
मुख्य परीक्षा दृष्टिकोण (विश्लेषण)
  • प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की Australia यात्रा दिखाती है कि India-Australia ties अब diaspora और cricket से आगे बढ़कर full-spectrum strategic partnership में बदल रहे हैं। Defence और maritime outcomes Indo-Pacific security को मजबूत करते हैं; PACTS और critical minerals cooperation technology तथा supply-chain vulnerabilities को address करते हैं; uranium और energy cooperation India की energy security को support करते हैं; education और skilling outcomes human capital बनाते हैं; और TKDL plus artefact repatriation cultural तथा knowledge diplomacy को जोड़ते हैं। भारत की foreign policy के लिए Australia अब economic growth, technology resilience और rules-based regional order को संतुलित करने वाला प्रमुख partner है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: India-Australia relations, Indo-Pacific, Quad, diaspora, cultural diplomacy; GS3: defence, cyber security, critical minerals, civil nuclear energy, supply chains, education और technology

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की 2026 Australia यात्रा के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. भारत और ऑस्ट्रेलिया ने IAEA safeguards के अंतर्गत peaceful purposes के लिए Australian uranium की India को supply सक्षम करने वाले administrative arrangements finalise किए। 2. PACTS cyber, critical technologies और supply chains पर केंद्रित है। 3. India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration इसी यात्रा के दौरान release किया गया। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: D
व्याख्या: तीनों कथन सही हैं। इस यात्रा में civil nuclear cooperation, PACTS और India-Australia Roadmap for Sports Collaboration से जुड़े outcomes सामने आए।
Major Notesप्रमुख नोट्स
Economy · Major Note
States Carry Growing Share of Welfare Spending
A data-based report highlighted that while revenues increasingly accrue to the Union government, fiscally constrained States are carrying a larger share of welfare and social-sector spending. For selected welfare schemes …

Exam Points

  • The report was published as a Data Point on welfare spending.
  • Data sources included Union Expenditure Budget 2025-26, 377th Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee, RBI database, Ministry of Education data and 16th Finance Commission reports.
  • Combined Union and State allocations for selected welfare schemes/sectors in 2025-26 were estimated at ₹24.20 lakh crore.
  • This amounted to 6.77% of GDP.
  • Union allocation for selected schemes was ₹6.73 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹17.46 lakh crore.
  • Union share of selected schemes was 1.89% of GDP, while State share was 4.89% of GDP.
  • State cash transfers were estimated at ₹3.87 lakh crore in FY 2025-26.
  • Union allocation for PM-KISAN was ₹0.64 lakh crore.
  • Union allocation for National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) was ₹0.1 lakh crore.
  • School education showed one of the largest State spending shares, with States estimated to contribute around 75.2%.
  • For school education, Union allocation was shown as ₹0.79 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹6.83 lakh crore.
  • For public health, Union allocation was shown as ₹1 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹3.93 lakh crore.
GS2: Welfare Schemes, Cooperative Federalism, Social Justice; GS3: Public Finance, Inclusive Growth, Human Capital

News Item

A data-based report highlighted that while revenues increasingly accrue to the Union government, fiscally constrained States are carrying a larger share of welfare and social-sector spending. For selected welfare schemes and sectors in 2025-26, combined Union and State allocations were estimated at ₹24.20 lakh crore, equal to 6.77% of GDP.

Background

The report noted that India’s welfare framework earlier moved through rights-based laws, but in the last decade the emphasis has shifted more towards cash transfers. It compared Union and State allocations across sectors such as school education, public health, MGNREGA, social justice, ICDS, PMMVY, PDS and cash transfers.

Prelims Facts

  • The report was published as a Data Point on welfare spending.
  • Data sources included Union Expenditure Budget 2025-26, 377th Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee, RBI database, Ministry of Education data and 16th Finance Commission reports.
  • Combined Union and State allocations for selected welfare schemes/sectors in 2025-26 were estimated at ₹24.20 lakh crore.
  • This amounted to 6.77% of GDP.
  • Union allocation for selected schemes was ₹6.73 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹17.46 lakh crore.
  • Union share of selected schemes was 1.89% of GDP, while State share was 4.89% of GDP.
  • State cash transfers were estimated at ₹3.87 lakh crore in FY 2025-26.
  • Union allocation for PM-KISAN was ₹0.64 lakh crore.
  • Union allocation for National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) was ₹0.1 lakh crore.
  • School education showed one of the largest State spending shares, with States estimated to contribute around 75.2%.
  • For school education, Union allocation was shown as ₹0.79 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹6.83 lakh crore.
  • For public health, Union allocation was shown as ₹1 lakh crore, while State allocation was ₹3.93 lakh crore.
Mains Focus & Analysis
  • The data shows that India’s welfare spending is increasingly State-led. This has two implications. First, States are crucial for actual delivery of education, health, nutrition and social protection. Second, if revenues remain concentrated with the Union, States may struggle to expand welfare without worsening fiscal stress. A stronger social-sector push requires better fiscal transfers, predictable cost-sharing, greater Union commitment and recognition that welfare expenditure is an investment in human development and long-term growth.

GS Mapping

GS2: Welfare Schemes, Cooperative Federalism, Social Justice; GS3: Public Finance, Inclusive Growth, Human Capital

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements based on the report on welfare spending: 1. Combined Union and State allocations for selected welfare schemes/sectors in 2025-26 were estimated at ₹24.20 lakh crore. 2. State allocation for selected welfare schemes/sectors was higher than Union allocation. 3. State cash transfers were estimated to be lower than the Union allocation for PM-KISAN. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: A
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. The combined allocation was ₹24.20 lakh crore, with State allocation ₹17.46 lakh crore and Union allocation ₹6.73 lakh crore. Statement 3 is incorrect because State cash transfers were estimated at ₹3.87 lakh crore, much higher than PM-KISAN’s Union allocation of ₹0.64 lakh crore.
कल्याणकारी खर्च का बढ़ता बोझ राज्यों पर
एक data-based report में बताया गया कि जहां revenues का बड़ा हिस्सा Union government को मिल रहा है, वहीं fiscally constrained States welfare और social-sector spending का बड़ा हिस्सा उठा …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • यह report welfare spending पर एक Data Point के रूप में प्रकाशित हुई।
  • Data sources में Union Expenditure Budget 2025-26, Parliamentary Standing Committee की 377th Report, RBI database, Ministry of Education data और 16th Finance Commission reports शामिल थे।
  • 2025-26 में selected welfare schemes/sectors पर Union और State combined allocations ₹24.20 lakh crore आंकी गईं।
  • यह GDP का 6.77% था।
  • Selected schemes के लिए Union allocation ₹6.73 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹17.46 lakh crore था।
  • Selected schemes का Union share GDP का 1.89%, जबकि State share GDP का 4.89% था।
  • FY 2025-26 में State cash transfers ₹3.87 lakh crore आंके गए।
  • PM-KISAN के लिए Union allocation ₹0.64 lakh crore था।
  • National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) के लिए Union allocation ₹0.1 lakh crore था।
  • School education में States का spending share बहुत बड़ा है, जिसे लगभग 75.2% आंका गया।
  • School education में Union allocation ₹0.79 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹6.83 lakh crore दिखाया गया।
  • Public health में Union allocation ₹1 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹3.93 lakh crore दिखाया गया।
GS2: welfare schemes, cooperative federalism, social justice; GS3: public finance, inclusive growth, human capital

समाचार

एक data-based report में बताया गया कि जहां revenues का बड़ा हिस्सा Union government को मिल रहा है, वहीं fiscally constrained States welfare और social-sector spending का बड़ा हिस्सा उठा रहे हैं। 2025-26 में selected welfare schemes और sectors पर Union और States की combined allocations ₹24.20 lakh crore आंकी गईं, जो GDP का 6.77% है।

पृष्ठभूमि

Report के अनुसार भारत का welfare framework पहले rights-based laws के माध्यम से विकसित हुआ, लेकिन पिछले दशक में emphasis अधिकतर cash transfers की ओर shifted हुआ है। इसमें school education, public health, MGNREGA, social justice, ICDS, PMMVY, PDS और cash transfers जैसे sectors में Union और State allocations की तुलना की गई।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • यह report welfare spending पर एक Data Point के रूप में प्रकाशित हुई।
  • Data sources में Union Expenditure Budget 2025-26, Parliamentary Standing Committee की 377th Report, RBI database, Ministry of Education data और 16th Finance Commission reports शामिल थे।
  • 2025-26 में selected welfare schemes/sectors पर Union और State combined allocations ₹24.20 lakh crore आंकी गईं।
  • यह GDP का 6.77% था।
  • Selected schemes के लिए Union allocation ₹6.73 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹17.46 lakh crore था।
  • Selected schemes का Union share GDP का 1.89%, जबकि State share GDP का 4.89% था।
  • FY 2025-26 में State cash transfers ₹3.87 lakh crore आंके गए।
  • PM-KISAN के लिए Union allocation ₹0.64 lakh crore था।
  • National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) के लिए Union allocation ₹0.1 lakh crore था।
  • School education में States का spending share बहुत बड़ा है, जिसे लगभग 75.2% आंका गया।
  • School education में Union allocation ₹0.79 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹6.83 lakh crore दिखाया गया।
  • Public health में Union allocation ₹1 lakh crore, जबकि State allocation ₹3.93 lakh crore दिखाया गया।
मुख्य परीक्षा दृष्टिकोण (विश्लेषण)
  • Data दिखाता है कि भारत का welfare spending increasingly State-led हो रहा है। इसके दो implications हैं। पहला, education, health, nutrition और social protection की actual delivery में States की भूमिका central है। दूसरा, यदि revenues Union के पास अधिक concentrated रहते हैं, तो States fiscal stress बढ़ाए बिना welfare expand करने में संघर्ष कर सकते हैं। Stronger social-sector push के लिए better fiscal transfers, predictable cost-sharing, greater Union commitment और welfare expenditure को human development तथा long-term growth में investment मानने की जरूरत है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: welfare schemes, cooperative federalism, social justice; GS3: public finance, inclusive growth, human capital

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. Welfare spending पर report के आधार पर निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. 2025-26 में selected welfare schemes/sectors पर Union और State combined allocations ₹24.20 lakh crore आंकी गईं। 2. Selected welfare schemes/sectors के लिए State allocation, Union allocation से अधिक था। 3. State cash transfers, PM-KISAN के Union allocation से कम आंके गए। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: A
व्याख्या: कथन 1 और 2 सही हैं। Combined allocation ₹24.20 lakh crore था, जिसमें State allocation ₹17.46 lakh crore और Union allocation ₹6.73 lakh crore था। कथन 3 गलत है क्योंकि State cash transfers ₹3.87 lakh crore आंके गए, जो PM-KISAN के Union allocation ₹0.64 lakh crore से काफी अधिक है।
Polity and Governance · Major Note
Right to be Forgotten and the Delhi High Court Ruling
The Delhi High Court recently laid down principles on the right to be forgotten, holding that the right flows from Article 21 as part of dignity and informational privacy. The …

Exam Points

  • The Delhi High Court recognised the right to be forgotten as part of privacy under Article 21.
  • The ruling came in a batch of over 30 consolidated petitions led by Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India.
  • The court held that retention of personal data must have a legitimate purpose and must be proportionate.
  • The court preferred masking or redaction of names instead of deleting entire judgments.
  • The court prescribed a two-week deadline for legal databases to comply.
  • The Google Spain case, 2014 laid the global foundation for the right to erase, later reflected in Article 17 of the GDPR.
  • In India, K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) recognised privacy as a fundamental right.
  • The right to be forgotten often conflicts with Article 19(1)(a), open justice and the public’s right to know.
  • The DPDP Act, 2023 provides a limited statutory right to erasure, but does not clearly address judicial records and public archives.
  • Effective enforcement requires coordination between courts, legal databases, search engines, social media platforms and data protection institutions.
GS2: Fundamental Rights, Judiciary, Privacy, Free Speech, Data Protection, Governance

News Item

The Delhi High Court recently laid down principles on the right to be forgotten, holding that the right flows from Article 21 as part of dignity and informational privacy. The ruling came in a batch of over 30 petitions led by Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India, where the court considered whether judicial records should be erased, masked or de-indexed to protect privacy.

Background

The right to be forgotten gained global attention after the 2014 Google Spain case, where the European Court of Justice recognised the right to remove outdated or irrelevant search results. In India, the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) recognised privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21. Since then, High Courts have taken different approaches on whether names in judgments can be masked or search results de-indexed.

Prelims Facts

  • The Delhi High Court recognised the right to be forgotten as part of privacy under Article 21.
  • The ruling came in a batch of over 30 consolidated petitions led by Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India.
  • The court held that retention of personal data must have a legitimate purpose and must be proportionate.
  • The court preferred masking or redaction of names instead of deleting entire judgments.
  • The court prescribed a two-week deadline for legal databases to comply.
  • The Google Spain case, 2014 laid the global foundation for the right to erase, later reflected in Article 17 of the GDPR.
  • In India, K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) recognised privacy as a fundamental right.
  • The right to be forgotten often conflicts with Article 19(1)(a), open justice and the public’s right to know.
  • The DPDP Act, 2023 provides a limited statutory right to erasure, but does not clearly address judicial records and public archives.
  • Effective enforcement requires coordination between courts, legal databases, search engines, social media platforms and data protection institutions.
Mains Focus & Analysis
  • The right to be forgotten raises a complex constitutional question: how should law protect a person’s privacy and dignity without weakening open justice and free speech? The Delhi High Court’s approach is balanced because it avoids deleting judicial history and instead focuses on proportionate remedies like masking and de-indexing. However, enforcement remains difficult because search engines, legal databases, archives and social media work differently. India needs a clear institutional framework under the DPDP Act, a strong data protection board and judicial guidance from the Supreme Court to make this right practical.

GS Mapping

GS2: Fundamental Rights, Judiciary, Privacy, Free Speech, Data Protection, Governance

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about the right to be forgotten: 1. It may involve masking or de-indexing personal information from public digital access. 2. In India, it is linked to the right to privacy under Article 21. 3. It always requires complete deletion of original judicial records. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: A
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. The right to be forgotten may involve masking or de-indexing and is linked to privacy under Article 21. Statement 3 is incorrect because courts may prefer proportionate remedies like masking names instead of deleting entire judicial records.
Right to be Forgotten और दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट का फैसला
दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने हाल ही में right to be forgotten पर principles निर्धारित किए और कहा कि यह अधिकार Article 21 के तहत dignity और informational privacy का हिस्सा …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • Delhi High Court ने right to be forgotten को Article 21 के तहत privacy का हिस्सा माना।
  • यह फैसला Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India सहित 30 से अधिक consolidated petitions में आया।
  • Court ने कहा कि personal data retention का legitimate purpose होना चाहिए और वह proportionate होना चाहिए।
  • Court ने entire judgments delete करने के बजाय names की masking या redaction को प्राथमिकता दी।
  • Court ने legal databases के compliance के लिए दो सप्ताह की deadline तय की।
  • Google Spain case, 2014 ने right to erase की global foundation रखी, जिसे बाद में GDPR के Article 17 में शामिल किया गया।
  • भारत में K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) ने privacy को fundamental right माना।
  • Right to be forgotten का conflict अक्सर Article 19(1)(a), open justice और public’s right to know से होता है।
  • DPDP Act, 2023 limited statutory right to erasure देता है, लेकिन judicial records और public archives को स्पष्ट रूप से address नहीं करता।
  • Effective enforcement के लिए courts, legal databases, search engines, social media platforms और data protection institutions के बीच coordination जरूरी है।
GS2: मौलिक अधिकार, न्यायपालिका, privacy, free speech, data protection, governance

समाचार

दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने हाल ही में right to be forgotten पर principles निर्धारित किए और कहा कि यह अधिकार Article 21 के तहत dignity और informational privacy का हिस्सा है। यह फैसला Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India सहित 30 से अधिक petitions के batch में आया, जिसमें court ने यह देखा कि privacy protection के लिए judicial records को erase, mask या de-index किया जा सकता है या नहीं।

पृष्ठभूमि

Right to be forgotten को global attention 2014 Google Spain case के बाद मिला, जिसमें European Court of Justice ने outdated या irrelevant search results हटाने के अधिकार को मान्यता दी। भारत में Supreme Court ने K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) में privacy को Article 21 के तहत fundamental right माना। इसके बाद High Courts ने judgments में names mask करने या search results de-index करने पर अलग-अलग approaches अपनाए।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • Delhi High Court ने right to be forgotten को Article 21 के तहत privacy का हिस्सा माना।
  • यह फैसला Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India सहित 30 से अधिक consolidated petitions में आया।
  • Court ने कहा कि personal data retention का legitimate purpose होना चाहिए और वह proportionate होना चाहिए।
  • Court ने entire judgments delete करने के बजाय names की masking या redaction को प्राथमिकता दी।
  • Court ने legal databases के compliance के लिए दो सप्ताह की deadline तय की।
  • Google Spain case, 2014 ने right to erase की global foundation रखी, जिसे बाद में GDPR के Article 17 में शामिल किया गया।
  • भारत में K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) ने privacy को fundamental right माना।
  • Right to be forgotten का conflict अक्सर Article 19(1)(a), open justice और public’s right to know से होता है।
  • DPDP Act, 2023 limited statutory right to erasure देता है, लेकिन judicial records और public archives को स्पष्ट रूप से address नहीं करता।
  • Effective enforcement के लिए courts, legal databases, search engines, social media platforms और data protection institutions के बीच coordination जरूरी है।
मुख्य परीक्षा दृष्टिकोण (विश्लेषण)
  • Right to be forgotten एक जटिल constitutional question उठाता है: law व्यक्ति की privacy और dignity की रक्षा कैसे करे, बिना open justice और free speech को कमजोर किए? Delhi High Court का approach balanced है क्योंकि यह judicial history को delete नहीं करता और masking तथा de-indexing जैसे proportionate remedies पर focus करता है। लेकिन enforcement कठिन है क्योंकि search engines, legal databases, archives और social media अलग-अलग तरीके से काम करते हैं। इस right को practical बनाने के लिए DPDP Act के तहत clear institutional framework, strong data protection board और Supreme Court की judicial guidance जरूरी है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: मौलिक अधिकार, न्यायपालिका, privacy, free speech, data protection, governance

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. Right to be forgotten के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. इसमें personal information को public digital access से mask या de-index करना शामिल हो सकता है। 2. भारत में यह Article 21 के तहत right to privacy से जुड़ा है। 3. इसमें हमेशा original judicial records को पूरी तरह delete करना आवश्यक होता है। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: A
व्याख्या: कथन 1 और 2 सही हैं। Right to be forgotten में masking या de-indexing शामिल हो सकती है और यह Article 21 के तहत privacy से जुड़ा है। कथन 3 गलत है क्योंकि courts entire judicial records delete करने के बजाय names masking जैसी proportionate remedies को प्राथमिकता दे सकती हैं।
International Relations · Major Note
Hummus Trail and Legal Scrutiny Over Foreign Soldiers in India
An explainer discussed the “Hummus Trail”, a popular travel circuit in India frequented by young Israeli tourists and military veterans, after the Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) filed a complaint seeking …

Exam Points

  • The issue arose after the Hind Rajab Foundation, a Brussels-based Palestinian rights organisation, filed a complaint in India.
  • The complaint sought action against an Israeli soldier vacationing in Himachal Pradesh.
  • The HRF alleged involvement in war crimes in Gaza in 2024.
  • India is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions.
  • India enacted the Geneva Conventions Act, 1960.
  • The Act criminalises grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.
  • The Hummus Trail includes Israeli-frequented places such as Kasol, Old Manali, Dharamkot, Goa, Gokarna, Rishikesh, Varanasi, Pushkar, Almora, Kodaikanal and Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
  • The report mentions that around 80,000 Israelis visit India every year.
  • Long post-military trips by Israeli youth are known as Tiyul Gadol.
  • In February 2026, the Israeli government reportedly allocated four million NIS to boost tourism collaboration with India.
  • The report noted that HRF has initiated similar legal actions in countries such as Brazil, Romania, Peru, Belgium, Canada and Chile.
GS2: International Relations, International Law, Human Rights, India-Israel Relations; GS3: Internal Security and Transnational Crime

News Item

An explainer discussed the “Hummus Trail”, a popular travel circuit in India frequented by young Israeli tourists and military veterans, after the Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) filed a complaint seeking action against an Israeli soldier vacationing in Himachal Pradesh. The issue raised a legal question: can India act against foreign nationals accused of grave breaches under the Geneva Conventions?

Background

The HRF alleged that the Israeli soldier was involved in war crimes in Gaza in 2024 and submitted social media, geo-located videos and chain-of-command material with its complaint to Indian authorities. The report noted that India is a party to the Geneva Conventions and has enacted the Geneva Conventions Act, 1960, which criminalises grave breaches. However, actual action would depend on investigation, evidence, legal procedure and the decision of Indian authorities.

Prelims Facts

  • The issue arose after the Hind Rajab Foundation, a Brussels-based Palestinian rights organisation, filed a complaint in India.
  • The complaint sought action against an Israeli soldier vacationing in Himachal Pradesh.
  • The HRF alleged involvement in war crimes in Gaza in 2024.
  • India is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions.
  • India enacted the Geneva Conventions Act, 1960.
  • The Act criminalises grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.
  • The Hummus Trail includes Israeli-frequented places such as Kasol, Old Manali, Dharamkot, Goa, Gokarna, Rishikesh, Varanasi, Pushkar, Almora, Kodaikanal and Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
  • The report mentions that around 80,000 Israelis visit India every year.
  • Long post-military trips by Israeli youth are known as Tiyul Gadol.
  • In February 2026, the Israeli government reportedly allocated four million NIS to boost tourism collaboration with India.
  • The report noted that HRF has initiated similar legal actions in countries such as Brazil, Romania, Peru, Belgium, Canada and Chile.
Mains Focus & Analysis
  • The Hummus Trail debate shows how tourism, war crimes allegations and international law can intersect. India must ensure that its territory does not become a safe space for impunity, but it must also act only through due process, credible evidence and legally competent procedures. The case highlights the need for clearer domestic mechanisms to handle allegations of grave international crimes, coordination between immigration and law-enforcement agencies, and careful balancing of India’s diplomatic ties with its international humanitarian law obligations.

GS Mapping

GS2: International Relations, International Law, Human Rights, India-Israel Relations; GS3: Internal Security and Transnational Crime

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about the Hummus Trail and the Geneva Conventions: 1. The Hummus Trail refers to an unofficial Indian travel circuit popular among Israeli tourists. 2. India has enacted the Geneva Conventions Act, 1960. 3. Universal jurisdiction means a country may prosecute certain serious international crimes even when committed outside its territory. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: D
Explanation: All three statements are correct. The Hummus Trail is an unofficial travel circuit popular among Israeli tourists; India has the Geneva Conventions Act, 1960; and universal jurisdiction allows prosecution of certain serious international crimes even when committed abroad.
‘हम्मस ट्रेल’ और भारत में विदेशी सैनिकों पर कानूनी जांच
एक explainer में “Hummus Trail” की चर्चा की गई, जो भारत में young Israeli tourists और military veterans के बीच लोकप्रिय travel circuit है। यह मुद्दा तब उठा जब Hind …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • यह मुद्दा Brussels-based Palestinian rights organisation Hind Rajab Foundation द्वारा India में complaint file करने के बाद उठा।
  • Complaint में Himachal Pradesh में vacation कर रहे एक Israeli soldier के खिलाफ action की मांग की गई।
  • HRF ने 2024 में Gaza में war crimes में involvement का allegation लगाया।
  • भारत Geneva Conventions का signatory है।
  • भारत ने Geneva Conventions Act, 1960 बनाया है।
  • यह Act Geneva Conventions के grave breaches को criminalise करता है।
  • Hummus Trail में Israeli tourists के बीच लोकप्रिय स्थान जैसे Kasol, Old Manali, Dharamkot, Goa, Gokarna, Rishikesh, Varanasi, Pushkar, Almora, Kodaikanal और Andaman and Nicobar Islands शामिल हैं।
  • Report के अनुसार हर वर्ष लगभग 80,000 Israelis भारत आते हैं।
  • Israeli youth की long post-military trips को Tiyul Gadol कहा जाता है।
  • February 2026 में Israeli government ने India के साथ tourism collaboration बढ़ाने के लिए reportedly four million NIS allocate किए।
  • Report में कहा गया कि HRF ने Brazil, Romania, Peru, Belgium, Canada और Chile जैसे देशों में भी similar legal actions initiate किए हैं।
GS2: international relations, international law, human rights, India-Israel relations; GS3: internal security और transnational crime

समाचार

एक explainer में “Hummus Trail” की चर्चा की गई, जो भारत में young Israeli tourists और military veterans के बीच लोकप्रिय travel circuit है। यह मुद्दा तब उठा जब Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) ने हिमाचल प्रदेश में vacation कर रहे एक Israeli soldier के खिलाफ action की मांग करते हुए complaint filed की। इससे कानूनी सवाल उठा: क्या भारत Geneva Conventions के grave breaches के आरोपी foreign nationals पर कार्रवाई कर सकता है?

पृष्ठभूमि

HRF ने आरोप लगाया कि Israeli soldier 2024 में Gaza में war crimes में involved था और उसने Indian authorities को social media material, geo-located videos और chain-of-command documentation के साथ complaint दी। Report के अनुसार भारत Geneva Conventions का party है और उसने Geneva Conventions Act, 1960 बनाया है, जो grave breaches को criminalise करता है। हालांकि वास्तविक action investigation, evidence, legal procedure और Indian authorities के decision पर निर्भर करेगा।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • यह मुद्दा Brussels-based Palestinian rights organisation Hind Rajab Foundation द्वारा India में complaint file करने के बाद उठा।
  • Complaint में Himachal Pradesh में vacation कर रहे एक Israeli soldier के खिलाफ action की मांग की गई।
  • HRF ने 2024 में Gaza में war crimes में involvement का allegation लगाया।
  • भारत Geneva Conventions का signatory है।
  • भारत ने Geneva Conventions Act, 1960 बनाया है।
  • यह Act Geneva Conventions के grave breaches को criminalise करता है।
  • Hummus Trail में Israeli tourists के बीच लोकप्रिय स्थान जैसे Kasol, Old Manali, Dharamkot, Goa, Gokarna, Rishikesh, Varanasi, Pushkar, Almora, Kodaikanal और Andaman and Nicobar Islands शामिल हैं।
  • Report के अनुसार हर वर्ष लगभग 80,000 Israelis भारत आते हैं।
  • Israeli youth की long post-military trips को Tiyul Gadol कहा जाता है।
  • February 2026 में Israeli government ने India के साथ tourism collaboration बढ़ाने के लिए reportedly four million NIS allocate किए।
  • Report में कहा गया कि HRF ने Brazil, Romania, Peru, Belgium, Canada और Chile जैसे देशों में भी similar legal actions initiate किए हैं।
मुख्य परीक्षा दृष्टिकोण (विश्लेषण)
  • Hummus Trail debate दिखाता है कि tourism, war crimes allegations और international law कैसे intersect कर सकते हैं। भारत को यह सुनिश्चित करना चाहिए कि उसकी territory impunity का safe space न बने, लेकिन उसे due process, credible evidence और legally competent procedures के माध्यम से ही action लेना चाहिए। यह मामला grave international crimes के allegations handle करने के लिए clear domestic mechanisms, immigration और law-enforcement agencies के coordination तथा India की diplomatic ties और international humanitarian law obligations के बीच careful balancing की जरूरत दिखाता है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: international relations, international law, human rights, India-Israel relations; GS3: internal security और transnational crime

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. Hummus Trail और Geneva Conventions के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. Hummus Trail भारत में Israeli tourists के बीच popular एक unofficial travel circuit को कहा जाता है। 2. भारत ने Geneva Conventions Act, 1960 लागू किया है। 3. Universal jurisdiction का अर्थ है कि कोई देश कुछ गंभीर international crimes पर prosecution कर सकता है, भले ही वे उसकी territory के बाहर committed हुए हों। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: D
व्याख्या: तीनों कथन सही हैं। Hummus Trail Israeli tourists के बीच popular unofficial travel circuit है; भारत के पास Geneva Conventions Act, 1960 है; और universal jurisdiction कुछ गंभीर international crimes पर abroad committed होने पर भी prosecution की अनुमति देता है।
Education · Major Note
Female Enrolment in Higher Education Rises Over 42% Since 2014
The latest All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) reports for 2022-23 and 2023-24 show steady growth in India’s higher education sector. Total student enrolment rose to 4.50 crore in …

Exam Points

  • The report is based on AISHE 2022-23 and 2023-24 data.
  • Total higher education enrolment reached 4.50 crore in 2023-24.
  • Total enrolment increased by 31.5% from 3.42 crore in 2014-15.
  • Female enrolment rose from 1.57 crore in 2014-15 to 2.24 crore in 2023-24.
  • Female enrolment increased by 42.2% since 2014-15.
  • Overall GER reached 30.0 in 2023-24.
  • Female GER rose to 31.2, higher than the national GER.
  • Gender Parity Index stood at 1.08 in 2023-24.
  • GPI has remained above 1.0 for seven consecutive years.
  • SC enrolment rose by 51.4%, reaching 69.72 lakh.
  • GER for SC students increased from 18.9 to 27.8.
  • ST enrolment rose by 75.7%, reaching 28.83 lakh.
  • GER for ST students increased from 13.5 to 22.8.
  • OBC student numbers grew by 60.2%, from 1.13 crore to 1.80 crore.
  • STEM enrolment increased from 91.5 lakh to 1.02 crore.
  • Female share in STEM programmes increased from 38.4% to 44%.
  • The data were self-reported by institutions through a web-based portal.
GS2: Education, Women Empowerment, Social Justice, Human Resource Development; GS3: STEM, Innovation, Skill Development

News Item

The latest All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) reports for 2022-23 and 2023-24 show steady growth in India’s higher education sector. Total student enrolment rose to 4.50 crore in 2023-24, marking a 31.5% increase from 3.42 crore in 2014-15, while female enrolment rose by 42.2% during the same period.

Background

The Education Ministry’s survey covered data from 59,533 higher education institutions, with institutional participation above 90%. The reports highlight growth in inclusivity, women’s participation, STEM enrolment and participation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.

Prelims Facts

  • The report is based on AISHE 2022-23 and 2023-24 data.
  • Total higher education enrolment reached 4.50 crore in 2023-24.
  • Total enrolment increased by 31.5% from 3.42 crore in 2014-15.
  • Female enrolment rose from 1.57 crore in 2014-15 to 2.24 crore in 2023-24.
  • Female enrolment increased by 42.2% since 2014-15.
  • Overall GER reached 30.0 in 2023-24.
  • Female GER rose to 31.2, higher than the national GER.
  • Gender Parity Index stood at 1.08 in 2023-24.
  • GPI has remained above 1.0 for seven consecutive years.
  • SC enrolment rose by 51.4%, reaching 69.72 lakh.
  • GER for SC students increased from 18.9 to 27.8.
  • ST enrolment rose by 75.7%, reaching 28.83 lakh.
  • GER for ST students increased from 13.5 to 22.8.
  • OBC student numbers grew by 60.2%, from 1.13 crore to 1.80 crore.
  • STEM enrolment increased from 91.5 lakh to 1.02 crore.
  • Female share in STEM programmes increased from 38.4% to 44%.
  • The data were self-reported by institutions through a web-based portal.
Mains Focus & Analysis
  • The AISHE data reflects important progress in higher education access, especially for women and marginalised communities. Higher female GER and a GPI above 1 show that women’s participation is now outpacing male participation in many areas. However, India must move beyond enrolment numbers and focus on quality, affordability, research capacity, STEM outcomes, employability and regional equity. Stronger data verification is also needed because AISHE data are self-reported by institutions.

GS Mapping

GS2: Education, Women Empowerment, Social Justice, Human Resource Development; GS3: STEM, Innovation, Skill Development

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements based on the latest AISHE data: 1. Female enrolment in higher education rose by 42.2% since 2014-15. 2. The female GER in 2023-24 was higher than the national GER. 3. The Gender Parity Index in higher education remained below 1.0 in 2023-24. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: A
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Female enrolment rose by 42.2%, and female GER reached 31.2, higher than the national GER of 30.0. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Gender Parity Index was 1.08, above 1.0.
2014 से उच्च शिक्षा में महिला नामांकन 42% से अधिक बढ़ा
All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) की 2022-23 और 2023-24 reports के अनुसार भारत के higher education sector में steady growth दर्ज हुई है। Total student enrolment 2023-24 में …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • Report AISHE 2022-23 और 2023-24 data पर आधारित है।
  • Higher education में total enrolment 2023-24 में 4.50 crore पहुंचा।
  • Total enrolment 2014-15 के 3.42 crore से 31.5% बढ़ा।
  • Female enrolment 2014-15 में 1.57 crore से बढ़कर 2023-24 में 2.24 crore हुआ।
  • 2014-15 से female enrolment में 42.2% वृद्धि हुई।
  • Overall GER 2023-24 में 30.0 पहुंचा।
  • Female GER 31.2 रहा, जो national GER से अधिक है।
  • Gender Parity Index 2023-24 में 1.08 रहा।
  • GPI लगातार सात वर्षों से 1.0 से ऊपर बना हुआ है।
  • SC enrolment 51.4% बढ़कर 69.72 lakh पहुंचा।
  • SC students का GER 18.9 से 27.8 हुआ।
  • ST enrolment 75.7% बढ़कर 28.83 lakh पहुंचा।
  • ST students का GER 13.5 से 22.8 हुआ।
  • OBC student numbers 60.2% बढ़कर 1.13 crore से 1.80 crore हुए।
  • STEM enrolment 91.5 lakh से बढ़कर 1.02 crore हुआ।
  • STEM programmes में female share 38.4% से बढ़कर 44% हुआ।
  • Data institutions द्वारा web-based portal के माध्यम से self-reported था।
GS2: शिक्षा, महिला सशक्तिकरण, सामाजिक न्याय, मानव संसाधन विकास; GS3: STEM, innovation, skill development

समाचार

All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) की 2022-23 और 2023-24 reports के अनुसार भारत के higher education sector में steady growth दर्ज हुई है। Total student enrolment 2023-24 में 4.50 crore पहुंच गया, जो 2014-15 के 3.42 crore से 31.5% अधिक है, जबकि इसी अवधि में female enrolment 42.2% बढ़ा।

पृष्ठभूमि

Education Ministry के survey में 59,533 higher education institutions से data लिया गया, जिसमें institutional participation 90% से अधिक रहा। Reports ने inclusivity, women’s participation, STEM enrolment और Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes तथा Other Backward Classes की भागीदारी में वृद्धि को रेखांकित किया।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • Report AISHE 2022-23 और 2023-24 data पर आधारित है।
  • Higher education में total enrolment 2023-24 में 4.50 crore पहुंचा।
  • Total enrolment 2014-15 के 3.42 crore से 31.5% बढ़ा।
  • Female enrolment 2014-15 में 1.57 crore से बढ़कर 2023-24 में 2.24 crore हुआ।
  • 2014-15 से female enrolment में 42.2% वृद्धि हुई।
  • Overall GER 2023-24 में 30.0 पहुंचा।
  • Female GER 31.2 रहा, जो national GER से अधिक है।
  • Gender Parity Index 2023-24 में 1.08 रहा।
  • GPI लगातार सात वर्षों से 1.0 से ऊपर बना हुआ है।
  • SC enrolment 51.4% बढ़कर 69.72 lakh पहुंचा।
  • SC students का GER 18.9 से 27.8 हुआ।
  • ST enrolment 75.7% बढ़कर 28.83 lakh पहुंचा।
  • ST students का GER 13.5 से 22.8 हुआ।
  • OBC student numbers 60.2% बढ़कर 1.13 crore से 1.80 crore हुए।
  • STEM enrolment 91.5 lakh से बढ़कर 1.02 crore हुआ।
  • STEM programmes में female share 38.4% से बढ़कर 44% हुआ।
  • Data institutions द्वारा web-based portal के माध्यम से self-reported था।
मुख्य परीक्षा दृष्टिकोण (विश्लेषण)
  • AISHE data higher education access में महत्वपूर्ण progress दिखाता है, विशेषकर women और marginalised communities के लिए। Higher female GER और 1 से ऊपर GPI दिखाते हैं कि कई क्षेत्रों में women’s participation male participation से आगे है। लेकिन भारत को enrolment numbers से आगे बढ़कर quality, affordability, research capacity, STEM outcomes, employability और regional equity पर focus करना होगा। Data verification को भी मजबूत करना जरूरी है क्योंकि AISHE data institutions द्वारा self-reported होता है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: शिक्षा, महिला सशक्तिकरण, सामाजिक न्याय, मानव संसाधन विकास; GS3: STEM, innovation, skill development

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. Latest AISHE data के आधार पर निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. Higher education में female enrolment 2014-15 से 42.2% बढ़ा। 2. 2023-24 में female GER national GER से अधिक था। 3. 2023-24 में higher education का Gender Parity Index 1.0 से नीचे था। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: A
व्याख्या: कथन 1 और 2 सही हैं। Female enrolment 42.2% बढ़ा और female GER 31.2 रहा, जो national GER 30.0 से अधिक है। कथन 3 गलत है क्योंकि Gender Parity Index 1.08 था, यानी 1.0 से ऊपर।
Brief Newsसंक्षिप्त समाचार
Economy · Brief
WIPO Report Highlights India’s Rise in Intangible Investment
The World Intangible Investment Report 2026, launched by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Luiss Business School, highlighted India’s rise as a global innovation powerhouse. Union Commerce and Industry Minister …

Exam Points

  • The World Intangible Investment Report 2026 was launched by WIPO and Luiss Business School.
  • The report highlights investment in software, R&D, intellectual property, innovation and organisational capabilities.
  • India’s intangible investment reached USD 78.2 billion in 2023.
  • India recorded 7.9% growth in intangible investment.
  • India was reported as having the fastest growth in intangible investment among the world’s 15 largest economies.
  • Intangible investment in India grew ahead of tangible investment.
  • Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said India is building a knowledge-driven future powered by ideas, innovation and enterprise.
  • The report links India’s progress with reforms, digital transformation, startups and a strengthening innovation ecosystem.
GS3: Economy, Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, Startups, Digital Economy

News Item

The World Intangible Investment Report 2026, launched by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Luiss Business School, highlighted India’s rise as a global innovation powerhouse. Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said India recorded the fastest growth in intangible investment among the world’s 15 largest economies, reaching USD 78.2 billion in 2023 with 7.9% growth.

Prelims Facts

  • The World Intangible Investment Report 2026 was launched by WIPO and Luiss Business School.
  • The report highlights investment in software, R&D, intellectual property, innovation and organisational capabilities.
  • India’s intangible investment reached USD 78.2 billion in 2023.
  • India recorded 7.9% growth in intangible investment.
  • India was reported as having the fastest growth in intangible investment among the world’s 15 largest economies.
  • Intangible investment in India grew ahead of tangible investment.
  • Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said India is building a knowledge-driven future powered by ideas, innovation and enterprise.
  • The report links India’s progress with reforms, digital transformation, startups and a strengthening innovation ecosystem.

GS Mapping

GS3: Economy, Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, Startups, Digital Economy

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about the World Intangible Investment Report 2026: 1. It was launched by WIPO and Luiss Business School. 2. India’s intangible investment reached USD 78.2 billion in 2023. 3. Intangible investment includes software, R&D and intellectual property. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: D
Explanation: All three statements are correct. The report was launched by WIPO and Luiss Business School; India’s intangible investment reached USD 78.2 billion in 2023; and intangible investment includes areas such as software, R&D and intellectual property.
WIPO रिपोर्ट ने intangible investment में भारत की बढ़त को रेखांकित किया
World Intangible Investment Report 2026, जिसे World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) और Luiss Business School ने launch किया, ने भारत को global innovation powerhouse के रूप में उभरता बताया। केंद्रीय …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • World Intangible Investment Report 2026 को WIPO और Luiss Business School ने launch किया।
  • रिपोर्ट software, R&D, intellectual property, innovation और organisational capabilities में investment को highlight करती है।
  • भारत का intangible investment 2023 में USD 78.2 billion तक पहुंचा।
  • भारत ने intangible investment में 7.9% growth दर्ज की।
  • भारत को दुनिया की 15 सबसे बड़ी economies में intangible investment में सबसे तेज growth वाला देश बताया गया।
  • भारत में intangible investment, tangible investment से आगे बढ़ा।
  • केंद्रीय वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्री Piyush Goyal ने कहा कि भारत ideas, innovation और enterprise से powered knowledge-driven future बना रहा है।
  • रिपोर्ट भारत की प्रगति को reforms, digital transformation, startups और मजबूत innovation ecosystem से जोड़ती है।
GS3: अर्थव्यवस्था, innovation, intellectual property rights, startups, digital economy

समाचार

World Intangible Investment Report 2026, जिसे World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) और Luiss Business School ने launch किया, ने भारत को global innovation powerhouse के रूप में उभरता बताया। केंद्रीय वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्री Piyush Goyal के अनुसार, भारत ने दुनिया की 15 सबसे बड़ी economies में intangible investment में सबसे तेज वृद्धि दर्ज की और यह 2023 में USD 78.2 billion तक पहुंचा, जिसमें 7.9% growth रही।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • World Intangible Investment Report 2026 को WIPO और Luiss Business School ने launch किया।
  • रिपोर्ट software, R&D, intellectual property, innovation और organisational capabilities में investment को highlight करती है।
  • भारत का intangible investment 2023 में USD 78.2 billion तक पहुंचा।
  • भारत ने intangible investment में 7.9% growth दर्ज की।
  • भारत को दुनिया की 15 सबसे बड़ी economies में intangible investment में सबसे तेज growth वाला देश बताया गया।
  • भारत में intangible investment, tangible investment से आगे बढ़ा।
  • केंद्रीय वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्री Piyush Goyal ने कहा कि भारत ideas, innovation और enterprise से powered knowledge-driven future बना रहा है।
  • रिपोर्ट भारत की प्रगति को reforms, digital transformation, startups और मजबूत innovation ecosystem से जोड़ती है।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS3: अर्थव्यवस्था, innovation, intellectual property rights, startups, digital economy

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. World Intangible Investment Report 2026 के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. इसे WIPO और Luiss Business School ने launch किया। 2. भारत का intangible investment 2023 में USD 78.2 billion तक पहुंचा। 3. Intangible investment में software, R&D और intellectual property शामिल होते हैं। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: D
व्याख्या: तीनों कथन सही हैं। रिपोर्ट WIPO और Luiss Business School ने launch की; भारत का intangible investment 2023 में USD 78.2 billion तक पहुंचा; और intangible investment में software, R&D और intellectual property जैसे क्षेत्र शामिल हैं।
Education · Brief
Uttarakhand Becomes India’s Sixth Fully Literate State
Uttarakhand has become India’s sixth fully literate State after meeting the prescribed adult literacy benchmarks under National Education Policy 2020 and the ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme. The declaration …

Exam Points

  • Uttarakhand has become India’s sixth fully literate State.
  • The declaration was approved by the Governor on 8 July 2026.
  • The achievement is linked to NEP 2020 and ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme.
  • ULLAS stands for Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society.
  • The literacy standards were laid down by the Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Education.
  • Uttarakhand joins Mizoram, Goa, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh and Sikkim on the list of fully literate States.
  • Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami called the achievement historic.
  • The State government said it will continue promoting digital literacy, financial literacy, continuing education and life skills.
GS2: Education, Human Resource Development, Social Sector Schemes, Governance

News Item

Uttarakhand has become India’s sixth fully literate State after meeting the prescribed adult literacy benchmarks under National Education Policy 2020 and the ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme. The declaration was approved by the Governor on 8 July 2026.

Prelims Facts

  • Uttarakhand has become India’s sixth fully literate State.
  • The declaration was approved by the Governor on 8 July 2026.
  • The achievement is linked to NEP 2020 and ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme.
  • ULLAS stands for Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society.
  • The literacy standards were laid down by the Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Education.
  • Uttarakhand joins Mizoram, Goa, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh and Sikkim on the list of fully literate States.
  • Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami called the achievement historic.
  • The State government said it will continue promoting digital literacy, financial literacy, continuing education and life skills.

GS Mapping

GS2: Education, Human Resource Development, Social Sector Schemes, Governance

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about Uttarakhand’s fully literate State status: 1. Uttarakhand became India’s sixth fully literate State. 2. The achievement is linked to NEP 2020 and ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme. 3. ULLAS focuses only on school-going children below 15 years of age. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: A
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Uttarakhand became India’s sixth fully literate State under NEP 2020 and ULLAS. Statement 3 is incorrect because ULLAS focuses on adult learners, especially those aged 15 years and above.
उत्तराखंड भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बना
उत्तराखंड National Education Policy 2020 और ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme के तहत prescribed adult literacy benchmarks पूरा करने के बाद भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बन गया …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • उत्तराखंड भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बन गया है।
  • घोषणा को राज्यपाल ने 8 जुलाई 2026 को मंजूरी दी।
  • यह उपलब्धि NEP 2020 और ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme से जुड़ी है।
  • ULLAS का पूरा नाम Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society है।
  • Literacy standards Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Education द्वारा निर्धारित किए गए।
  • उत्तराखंड अब fully literate States की सूची में Mizoram, Goa, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh और Sikkim के साथ शामिल हो गया है।
  • मुख्यमंत्री Pushkar Singh Dhami ने इस उपलब्धि को ऐतिहासिक बताया।
  • राज्य सरकार digital literacy, financial literacy, continuing education और life skills को बढ़ावा देना जारी रखेगी।
GS2: शिक्षा, मानव संसाधन विकास, सामाजिक क्षेत्र की योजनाएं, शासन

समाचार

उत्तराखंड National Education Policy 2020 और ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme के तहत prescribed adult literacy benchmarks पूरा करने के बाद भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बन गया है। इस घोषणा को राज्यपाल ने 8 जुलाई 2026 को मंजूरी दी।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • उत्तराखंड भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बन गया है।
  • घोषणा को राज्यपाल ने 8 जुलाई 2026 को मंजूरी दी।
  • यह उपलब्धि NEP 2020 और ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme से जुड़ी है।
  • ULLAS का पूरा नाम Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society है।
  • Literacy standards Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Education द्वारा निर्धारित किए गए।
  • उत्तराखंड अब fully literate States की सूची में Mizoram, Goa, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh और Sikkim के साथ शामिल हो गया है।
  • मुख्यमंत्री Pushkar Singh Dhami ने इस उपलब्धि को ऐतिहासिक बताया।
  • राज्य सरकार digital literacy, financial literacy, continuing education और life skills को बढ़ावा देना जारी रखेगी।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS2: शिक्षा, मानव संसाधन विकास, सामाजिक क्षेत्र की योजनाएं, शासन

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. उत्तराखंड के पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य status के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. उत्तराखंड भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बना। 2. यह उपलब्धि NEP 2020 और ULLAS – New India Literacy Programme से जुड़ी है। 3. ULLAS केवल 15 वर्ष से कम आयु के school-going children पर केंद्रित है। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: A
व्याख्या: कथन 1 और 2 सही हैं। उत्तराखंड NEP 2020 और ULLAS के तहत भारत का छठा पूर्ण साक्षर राज्य बना। कथन 3 गलत है क्योंकि ULLAS adult learners, विशेषकर 15 वर्ष और उससे अधिक आयु के लोगों पर केंद्रित है।
Economy · Brief
India Becomes Fourth Largest LNG Regasification Market
According to the International Gas Union’s World LNG Report, India’s LNG regasification capacity reached 52.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) across eight terminals in 2025, making it the fourth largest …

Exam Points

  • India’s LNG regasification capacity reached 52.5 mtpa across eight terminals in 2025.
  • India surpassed Spain to become the fourth largest regasification capacity market globally.
  • The data is from the IGU World LNG Report.
  • Dahej LNG Terminal has 17.5 mtpa capacity and is India’s largest LNG terminal.
  • Dahej ranks as the sixth largest LNG regasification facility globally.
  • India commissioned two LNG regasification projects in 2025.
  • New onshore terminal: Chhara LNG, with 5 mtpa capacity.
  • Expansion project: Dabhol LNG, whose capacity increased from 2.9 mtpa to 5 mtpa.
  • Four LNG projects are under construction in India and are expected to add 11.3 mtpa capacity by 2028.
  • India’s LNG regasification utilisation fell to about 47% in 2025, down from 58% in 2024.
  • Asia led global LNG regasification capacity additions in 2025.
  • China and India contributed 15.1 mtpa and 7.1 mtpa, respectively, to global additions.
GS3: Energy Security, Infrastructure, Natural Gas Economy, Logistics

News Item

According to the International Gas Union’s World LNG Report, India’s LNG regasification capacity reached 52.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) across eight terminals in 2025, making it the fourth largest regasification market globally after surpassing Spain.

Prelims Facts

  • India’s LNG regasification capacity reached 52.5 mtpa across eight terminals in 2025.
  • India surpassed Spain to become the fourth largest regasification capacity market globally.
  • The data is from the IGU World LNG Report.
  • Dahej LNG Terminal has 17.5 mtpa capacity and is India’s largest LNG terminal.
  • Dahej ranks as the sixth largest LNG regasification facility globally.
  • India commissioned two LNG regasification projects in 2025.
  • New onshore terminal: Chhara LNG, with 5 mtpa capacity.
  • Expansion project: Dabhol LNG, whose capacity increased from 2.9 mtpa to 5 mtpa.
  • Four LNG projects are under construction in India and are expected to add 11.3 mtpa capacity by 2028.
  • India’s LNG regasification utilisation fell to about 47% in 2025, down from 58% in 2024.
  • Asia led global LNG regasification capacity additions in 2025.
  • China and India contributed 15.1 mtpa and 7.1 mtpa, respectively, to global additions.

GS Mapping

GS3: Energy Security, Infrastructure, Natural Gas Economy, Logistics

Quick Check · 1 question
Q1. Consider the following statements about India’s LNG regasification capacity: 1. India became the fourth largest LNG regasification capacity market globally in 2025. 2. Dahej LNG Terminal is India’s largest LNG regasification terminal. 3. Chhara LNG was commissioned with a capacity of 5 mtpa. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: D
Explanation: All three statements are correct. India became the fourth largest LNG regasification market, Dahej is India’s largest LNG terminal, and Chhara LNG was commissioned with 5 mtpa capacity.
भारत चौथा सबसे बड़ा LNG Regasification Market बना
International Gas Union की World LNG Report के अनुसार, 2025 में भारत की LNG regasification capacity आठ terminals में 52.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) तक पहुंच गई, जिससे भारत …

परीक्षा बिंदु (Exam Points)

  • 2025 में भारत की LNG regasification capacity आठ terminals में 52.5 mtpa तक पहुंची।
  • भारत Spain को पीछे छोड़कर globally fourth largest regasification capacity market बन गया।
  • यह data IGU World LNG Report से है।
  • Dahej LNG Terminal की capacity 17.5 mtpa है और यह भारत का largest LNG terminal है।
  • Dahej globally sixth largest LNG regasification facility है।
  • भारत ने 2025 में दो LNG regasification projects commission किए।
  • New onshore terminal: Chhara LNG, capacity 5 mtpa.
  • Expansion project: Dabhol LNG, जिसकी capacity 2.9 mtpa से 5 mtpa हुई।
  • भारत में चार LNG projects under construction हैं, जो 2028 तक 11.3 mtpa capacity जोड़ सकते हैं।
  • भारत की LNG regasification utilisation 2025 में करीब 47% रही, जो 2024 में 58% थी।
  • 2025 में global LNG regasification capacity additions में Asia आगे रहा।
  • China और India ने global additions में क्रमशः 15.1 mtpa और 7.1 mtpa का योगदान दिया।
GS3: ऊर्जा सुरक्षा, अवसंरचना, natural gas economy, logistics

समाचार

International Gas Union की World LNG Report के अनुसार, 2025 में भारत की LNG regasification capacity आठ terminals में 52.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) तक पहुंच गई, जिससे भारत Spain को पीछे छोड़कर दुनिया का चौथा सबसे बड़ा regasification market बन गया।

प्रारंभिक परीक्षा तथ्य

  • 2025 में भारत की LNG regasification capacity आठ terminals में 52.5 mtpa तक पहुंची।
  • भारत Spain को पीछे छोड़कर globally fourth largest regasification capacity market बन गया।
  • यह data IGU World LNG Report से है।
  • Dahej LNG Terminal की capacity 17.5 mtpa है और यह भारत का largest LNG terminal है।
  • Dahej globally sixth largest LNG regasification facility है।
  • भारत ने 2025 में दो LNG regasification projects commission किए।
  • New onshore terminal: Chhara LNG, capacity 5 mtpa.
  • Expansion project: Dabhol LNG, जिसकी capacity 2.9 mtpa से 5 mtpa हुई।
  • भारत में चार LNG projects under construction हैं, जो 2028 तक 11.3 mtpa capacity जोड़ सकते हैं।
  • भारत की LNG regasification utilisation 2025 में करीब 47% रही, जो 2024 में 58% थी।
  • 2025 में global LNG regasification capacity additions में Asia आगे रहा।
  • China और India ने global additions में क्रमशः 15.1 mtpa और 7.1 mtpa का योगदान दिया।

जीएस मैपिंग

GS3: ऊर्जा सुरक्षा, अवसंरचना, natural gas economy, logistics

त्वरित अभ्यास · 1 प्रश्न
प्र1. भारत की LNG regasification capacity के बारे में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: 1. भारत 2025 में globally चौथा सबसे बड़ा LNG regasification capacity market बना। 2. Dahej LNG Terminal भारत का largest LNG regasification terminal है। 3. Chhara LNG को 5 mtpa capacity के साथ commission किया गया। ऊपर दिए गए कथनों में से कौन-से सही हैं?
उत्तर: D
व्याख्या: तीनों कथन सही हैं। भारत fourth largest LNG regasification market बना, Dahej भारत का largest LNG terminal है और Chhara LNG 5 mtpa capacity के साथ commission हुआ।